|
Who is a patriot?
Are you a patriot? I thought about it many times and I came to the conclusion that I'm not. At the same time I don't want to live abroad. Maybe I just say that because I've never lived and worked in other countries before. But I feel quite comfortable in my country.
I'm asking that question just because I've noticed that for some reasons many young people would like to escape from the country where they were born and brought up. So I wonder how many of you are patriots.
|
Of course we have a lot of positive things like our beautiful nature and rich natural resources. So, I can't call myself a patriot, nevertheless I like my country )
My record of service is more than 45 years. But I, being a retiree, am compelled to continue my work to ensure proper scale of living for my family and myself, for medicine and rest (I don’t mean the rest abroad!). Having been working at the Soviet Danube Shipping Company, I have seen as old simple people (frail old persons) from West Europe went to cruise along the Danube and around Mediterranean Sea aboard our river- and sea-going passenger liners. Their pension was enough for not merely for the household running costs and medicine but for sea cruise as well. How may it be that the richest country of the world can’t ensure its folks properly? I am deeply ashamed of my Motherland!..
1 year ago this place was Russia. Now it is Canada. If I return back to Russia I will try to bring something useful for Russia.
People are the same meaning that it is not important where you live.
I think every parent must explain his child how to distinguish between bad and good.
Well, the definitions. What is nationalism. Sold media companies have poured out much dirt on this. They try to turn(combine) nationalism and chauvinism. But these terms are not the same at all. What bad have they found in nationalism?
Nationalism is a desire for saving gene pool of a nation, love of its people, history, motherland, culture, traditions and NATIVE ideology, language, wish and ability to defend interests one's nation.
Internationalism is cosmopolitanism without a clan or a tribe. Cosmopolitanism strives for depersonalization of all nations on the earth, smelting all of these in one boiler, cutting all historical roots and breeding one ugly race "Universal person"
Personality can not be born outside a nation. A nation gives unique features that can not be given by someone else.
As for me I'm russian. I know my genealogy and my ancestors. We have never been nomads. I can not live somewhere else but in my country. I just can not imagine this. I will never turn traitor. While we are alive we defend our native ideology and territory.
I will never become a patriot of the authority. They say that we need to develop humanism and equality(Putin's words) and patriarch says that our ancestors worshipped devil.The time has come. Now we need to give up all bad habits, to go to gyms, to study and work a lot, to defend our ideology. But they say we need to calm down, bow our heads, turn the other cheek(then give our wives and children for an enemy), love our enemies, also we need to hate dislike and hatred(they consider these sins). We need to control our feelings and emotions to not get fooled or become monsters.
Patriot is a nice guy or girl :-). But you better think whose and what interests(ideology) you defend.
All our patriots were killed, jailed and taken to mental hospitals. That's the reason it is hard to be a patriot and support this.
Nationalist is an independent and educated person that lives and thinks independently. Nationalist thinks about nation and the whole world(also about nature and so on), he always analyses development of his country. So I consider it is more suitable here.
Many people think all was lost, we have nothing....But nobody knows that hard times(thousand years) forced our people to leave the land to save history and culture. They went away and settled on other lands to live safely. I just talk about native belief, native upbringing and all that is native :-) I wanna have a nice conversation with everyone who disagrees :-).
Selfishness can become "good selfishness" when you worry about yourself and people who are around you.
"October 16 1941. I became a witness of a mass jewish escape from occupied Moscow, as I lived in the beginning of Vladimirka - a road to the East. Seven men of a worker cordon, that stopped runners under a bridge for an examination, discovered full pans with gold coins of tsar chasing, rings and other jewellery, cases with money bundles in bank's packing and other hard-to-get goods that had been stolen from the state. By Stalin's order this worker cordon could shoot them according to war times, and all the more so to state of siege. But the event impressed on workers so much. It was very unusual and unexpected. So they informed Lubyanka about this. After a while security officers came, they were jews too, they disarmed all 7 workers, laid them on a hillside with faces down and shot them to the back of the head. And refugees continued their way along Enthusiasts' higway(Vladimirka) with all stolen."
And about nationalism..you know,I'm not against multinational country as it is, but still I sometimes understand people who are against foreigners, especially some nationalities...coz now in my own country I more and more feel like a stranger, a foreigner. Some of them behave like they are already natives and it freaks me out!!!
well, about international marriage - it's a question which have two sides... from one hand I'm against it, but on the other hand - if I had a person whom I really loved and he propose d to me (still I'm a forigner), than I'm for) so it all depends on what place you occupy in this struggle....
they come, come and come. For why? Anyway they will have to return to their motherland sometime.
Btw, government will never support our interests. The worse, the better. It is a law of fools(of smart fools).
I just don't understand what this loved is based on and why foreigners are better. There is the wide choice here ;-)
though I'm not one of that girls, may be I'm a little natioanalistic in this question)
who thinks that he can cognize this world only with his feelings is wrong. Feelings always lie. There are some things that a human can cognize with time(only if someone doesn't give him wrong ways and information he can).
I'll disagree with your definition of the word 'internationalism'. Yours is quite derogatory. Let me make some quotations.
According to Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English "Internationalism is a belief in the need for nations to work together in a friendly spirit".
According to Ozhegov's dictionary of russian language "Internationalism is ideology and policy of equality and solidarity of all nations in spite of national affiliation".
As you can see internationalism is not cosmopolitism. I should say that 'cosmopolitism' is more suitable for your definition of the word 'internationalism'.
I think(and it can be proved) that we need to think about ourselves then about others. It is stupid when they push their speeches about equality and solidarity. We need to love our nation and respect others but do not love everyone. We usually save ourselves and our relations in a hard time then we help the rest if we have a possibility. You think I need to die but rescue my neighbour? What is derogatory?
So cosmopolitanism and internationalism have the same aims. They call us to think about the whole world, to love everyone, to be equal.
Literature, traditions, knowledge, ideology, mentality, system of upbringing are important. Internationalism and cosmopolitanism should become the last what we need to carry about.
"Internationalism and cosmopolitanism should become the last what we need to carry about" Maybe it's better to put 'the iron curtain' again? Those both words were and will exist in a country with market economy. It's impossible to leave them behind and to concentrate on ourselves. Although I quite agree with you that the govenrment should pay more attention to its people.
Why do we need to contact with other countries if it does not bring a positive effect?
Yes, they will exist but not in the whole country. They will also become weak and weak with time.
You always think about last sixty years but we have lived many dozens thousands years and always knew who we are, how we need to live, we had welfare... I know you think it is all so ordinary and stupid. But self-actualization is very very important. The faster you answer this question, the better.
When I speak I try to express common sense, sometimes I forget about it but anyway...
Everyone feels that he needs to accumulate everything(knowledge, money...) and he is never satisfied. He always wants something. So we need to remember and don't get controlled by primitive feelings. There also instincts that don't allow you to get bored :-)
Well, common sense(I think I wrote this somewhere). Once I heard this and remembered. It often helps. It has 3 items. When you want to make a decision you must:
1. Find a competent man.
2. Personal experience.
3. Look up information in heredity.
When one of these items is absent it means that it is just an opinion.
Third item is the base. If there is not a base thoughts will not be supported.
If we take one's opinion(mother's :-) or from history or from a religion... it doesn't matter) it should not become our base. It is just an opinion. Parents were also told. Nobody knows who gave information and for why. There are two ways: right and wrong. One can poke into dirt like a fly or into honey like a bee.
You see that I'm mistaken when I talk using some words... I mean I think that my thoughts have common sense but sometimes I have problems sharing them. I want my country to become healthy, strong and independent(I'm not talking about now. It's a long hard process). I also think that everyone needs to become a nationalist.
Many sold channels show us sold men that inform us that one man became a nationalist and killed 10 foreigners without a reason. It doesn't mean that nationalism is a bad belief, it means that HE IS AN IDIOT OR A MADMAN.
If you jump from a roof after my words it doesn't mean that I'm so bad...
Many parents think they must train their child to be a specialist.
Time shows that they must mould a character. Then it will be easy for him to defend himself from wrong information and to learn how to use his skills.
Btw, I see (I think) that I can have a good influence on my young brother(he is 7). We have learned "A to G" alphabet today(reading,writing,pronunciation) :-D and some words. But I'm not about it. I just see that when parents don't attend enough time to the development of their child then TV, computer, foreign tales and other trash take their place. How we say if we don't care about politics then politics care about us. I will not tell him about economy system :-D but he understands some simple things. Dissent is not wrong if purposes are not wrong.
People who create this information sphere.... they are just people. Nothing more nothing less. They just have a bit more sense, know psychology well. And I think everyone can become smarter, become an independent person. The more independent we are, the more independent country is. If it is order in a family and in their heads, it will be order in the country.